During
the past two weeks, which are the two weeks before Haverfest, a group of
students station themselves in the DC lobby to sell Haverfest T-shirts, mugs,
sunglasses, and hats. While some students buy all of these items, the hot ones
are usually the T-shirts and the mugs. Every year, or at least for the two
years I have been here so far, there are two T-shirts to choose from and it
seems as though most people end up liking one of the shirts over the other.
This means that one shirt goes fast while there are usually leftovers of the other
one. I experienced this last year when I took too long to make a purchase and
the T-shirt type that I wanted, and the type that apparently everyone else
wanted, was sold out.
This
year, I was ready and jumped at the opportunity to buy the T-shirt that I and
everyone else seemed to like the best. I did not want to experience another
lost opportunity like I had the year before. At this point, I hadn’t realized
that one of the factors that was motivating my behavior was the principle of
scarcity. The moment I realized this was when, the next day, the students selling
the merchandise called out that there were only a limited number of the green
shirts left, and I felt pretty good about getting a shirt before they had all
sold out. I realized that what motivated me to by the better shirt early on was
the loss I had experienced last year. If I had any waited longer to buy the
shirt this year, not only would the memory of my loss from last year drive me
to buy it, but also the fact that the salespeople were yelling out that there
were only a few T-shirts of that kind left.
I
was thus hit by a double whammy of threat of loss, from both my past
experiences and the current situation. My motivation to buy the T-shirt primarily
lies in the social influence principle of scarcity. According to this
principle, individuals are motivated by loss or a threat of loss. In the case
of the Haverfest T-shirts, when there are a limited number of shirts left, they
will become more desired and the students will think that because the shirts
are going quickly, they are better. And because one shirt always seems to go
faster than another, this shirt is considered to be the more desirable one.
While it may actually look better than the other shirt, I think that scarcity
plays a significant role in why that particular T-shirt becomes sold out. For
instance, if a student had no preference for either of the shirts, but learned
that one of them had only a limited number left, this threat of loss and the
perceived desirability of the shirt would drive him or her to choose it over
the other one.
This
simple example of how scarcity influences my actions and those of other
students on campus made me think of how scarcity plays a role in other aspects of
life at Haverford. Every so often, an organization on campus called FAB (Fords
Against Boredom) gets tickets to sports games and musicals or has a certain of
number of spots on a bus to go ice skating, skiing, and laser tagging, all for
free! While giving students an opportunity to get off campus and have fun is
enough incentive to sign up for these activities, scarcity also plays a role.
Since there are a limited number of these tickets or spots, students will
perceive the activities as being more desirable. There is also a limited time
frame where you can sign up for the activities—students will get up at 7am in
hopes of getting their names on the list. Would these activities be less
desirable if there were an unlimited number of spots? The principle of scarcity
would suggest this.
The
effects of scarcity are also evident in the context of academics when
considering unlimited and limited enrollment classes. I have found that I am
usually drawn to the classes that have a limited enrollment, especially the
ones that are capped at 15, because I think they seem more interesting. What I
did not realize is that the idea of scarcity has influenced me to think this
way. Without knowing anything about the class except for the short description
on the registrar, I have made assumptions about the quality of the class just
because it is limited enrollment. It is interesting to speculate about how many
aspects of our life scarcity influences, and to what extent. We may make
decisions and be motivated to carry out certain behaviors not by rational
thinking, but because of this perceived threat of loss.
Image: Haverfest 2013 T-shirt design by Caroline Fleet. From: https://www.facebook.com/Haverfest2013
No comments:
Post a Comment